Fact: 91MPH with a Single on a 1976 Challenger
| HPBCANADA.COM http://www.hpbc.ca/ |
|
| Challenger 21 http://www.hpbc.ca/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=2144 |
Page 7 of 7 |
| Author: | Carson [ July 30th, 2014, 7:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Challenger 21 |
Nice! Ive got the 12" offset and and 8" offset jack plate but that might be a bit much lol |
|
| Author: | Carson [ August 7th, 2014, 11:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Challenger 21 |
Any one have experience rigging one of these with twin 2.4l? 60mph with a singles fun an all but you know how it is lol my sidewinder does 60 so im thinking this ones gotta be faster lol |
|
| Author: | BoomerMuskoka [ August 7th, 2014, 11:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Challenger 21 |
Carson wrote: Any one have experience rigging one of these with twin 2.4l? 60mph with a singles fun an all but you know how it is lol my sidewinder does 60 so im thinking this ones gotta be faster lol better off with a big block sob |
|
| Author: | idvette [ August 8th, 2014, 7:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Challenger 21 |
Double shivers has his rigged for twins. Haven't heard much about it lately though, he's been having fun with his 'streams |
|
| Author: | OneCycle [ August 8th, 2014, 8:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Challenger 21 |
Twin 2.4's aren't faster than a single Setup right. |
|
| Author: | 13Checkmate [ August 8th, 2014, 8:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Challenger 21 |
Id rather move up to the big block motors then trying to go with twins. Youd save a lot in fuel by going single as well. |
|
| Author: | OneCycle [ August 8th, 2014, 10:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Challenger 21 |
Fact: 91MPH with a Single on a 1976 Challenger
|
|
| Author: | Carson [ August 8th, 2014, 6:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Challenger 21 |
Saving fuel would be nice lol i already got the motor braket so ill run my 200 till i can aford something bigger. Twins for another time lol |
|
| Page 7 of 7 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group • http://www.phpbb.com | |